Many blackjack players believe that taking into account all factors, the odds of winning at a single-deck game are the same as experienced on a multi-deck shoe game. They believe that although an increased number of card decks are used, the identical number of cards is still involved; therefore even for an experienced blackjack player, or even a card-counter there is no advantage to playing in a single-deck game over a multi-deck game. This is not the case.
Putting nonmathematical considerations to the side e.g. single-deck games are easier to count successfully, Edward Thorp proved that a player's advantage diminishes as the number of decks utilised in the game increases. Adhering to blackjack basic strategy, the blackjack player has a 0.13% advantage over the casino in a single-deck blackjack game, but if a theoretical 5,000 decks were utilised then the player would be at a disadvantage of about 0.58% without tracking the cards. This makes logical sense due to the fact that the fewer cards used in a game, the m ore directly the removal of any number of them affects the distribution of the remaining cards.
Another reason to opt for a single-deck game as opposed to a six-deck game, whenever the rules are similar, is that you are less likely to get blackjacks in games that employ more cards. It sounds implausible, but compare the following two examples:
No wonder most casinos, if not all online casinos are moving towards offering blackjack games with an increased number of decks. Out of every hundred hands composed of Aces and ten value cards that are dealt from a shoe, the expectation of blackjack appearing in a six-deck game is nearly two fewer than it is from a similar single-deck game.